Low-traffic schemes benefit everyone, not just better-off, finds study
Authors find ‘no clear social equity problem related to low-traffic neighbourhoods’ after studying slew of projects sparked by Covid restrictions
- ‘I got it wrong. Since the changes it’s become more vibrant’: life in an LTN
- Mythbusters: eight common objections to LTNs – and why they are wrong
- Read more in our Green Streets series
There is no evidence schemes that try to limit “rat-running” traffic along residential streets disproportionately benefit better-off households, research has concluded, contradicting a common view cited by objectors.
A study of low-traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs), which have mushroomed as part of efforts to boost walking and cycling amid coronavirus, found that the vast majority of people lived on streets that could be part of such schemes.